Previous Page  18 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

Fall

2017

Grains

West

18

THE

FARMGATE

FUNGUSFIGHTER

FUSARIUMHEADBLIGHT TOOLWELL

RECEIVEDBY FARMERSANDAGCOMPANIES

BY IAN DOIG

THE FUSARIUM HEAD BLIGHT RISK

Tool was launched at the start of the 2017

growing season. Developed by the Alberta

Wheat Commission in collaboration with

the Alberta Climate Information Service,

the online resource features a local risk

indicator, a provincial risk map and a tab

detailing best management practices.

The map indicates the favourability of

weather conditions for the development

of Fusarium head blight (FHB) at wheat’s

most susceptible flowering stage, with a

range of low, moderate and high. With

climate data and management options

provided by the online tool, as well as

farmers’ own field assessments, local

infection history and crop-yield estimates,

farmers can make more informed deci-

sions about whether or not to spray, which

fungicides to use and when.

In Saskatchewan and Manitoba,

provinces where FHB has been prevalent

longer, risk maps have been in use for

some time.

AWC grower relations and extension

co-ordinator Brian Kennedy said response

to the risk tool from farmers, seed growers

and crop-protection companies has been

very positive. “Everybody really likes the

format,” he said. “We’re excited to add

features for 2018, but we want to keep

it simple and usable, as it is now.” Such

features will likely include a risk map for

barley once the model for predicting blight

in this grain is better developed.

Though he expected usage of the

tool will prove relatively low due to the

dryness of the 2017 growing season,

Kennedy predicted usage will increase

in coming years with wetter conditions.

A post-harvest examination of risk tool

analytics compiled over the season is

being carried out.

“You might have a new tool, but are

people aware of it?” said Daniel Itenfisu, a

drought modeller with the AgMet Unit of

Alberta Agriculture and Forestry. “It will

help us to get that feedback.”

Kelly Turkington, a research scientist

and plant pathologist at Agriculture and

Agri-Food Canada’s Lacombe Research

and Development Centre, has been ex-

tensively involved in FHB research on the

Prairies. He suggested that carrying out

ground truthing with the system will be

important over the next two to four years,

and hopes that funding for this may be

delivered federally through the Canadian

Agricultural Partnership, the successor

to

Growing Forward 2

. This could involve

examining the Canadian Grain Commis-

sion’s FHB-damaged kernel results as well

as targeted surveying of areas of predicted

low, moderate and high risk.

Any tweaks to the tool may be based

on what’s going on in Saskatchewan and

Manitoba, Turkington predicted. “I think

there is a desire that perhaps the three

provinces will co-ordinate activities.”

Does the risk of disease warrant either

the effort or expense of a fungicide appli-

cation? This is the big question the tool

helps to answer, said Dr. Michael Hard-

ing, research scientist, plant pathology,

pest surveillance section, Alberta Agricul-

ture and Forestry. “It provides information

that’s very close to up-to-the-minute about

what has happened and what that might

do with respect to risk of FHB developing

in an area.

“A number of farm units employ agron-

omists to help with this decision-making,”

he noted. “It would be used by those folks

to make recommendations to farmers.

“I think it will be quite valuable and the

uptake will increase over successive years

as we move past this beta test year and do

additional work to validate that the model

works well in Alberta, as it does in other

jurisdictions. As the word gets out and

more and more people get familiar with it,

I think it’ll be really useful.”

Though in much of the province dry

conditions have minimized the occur-

rence of this moisture-loving fungus,

Harding said the risk map will still have

proven useful in areas where drought con-

ditions did not occur. “Even though 2017

has been a really dry year, it’s nice to have

that tool available so we can start to add

that info into our decision-making.”

AWC grower relations and extension co-ordinator Brian Kennedy said response to the FHB risk tool

developed by AWC and Alberta Climate Information Service has been very positive.