Previous Page  11 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

Fall

2017

grainswest.com

11

BY NATALIE NOBLE

agreement could increase exports by up

to $1.2 billion per year—equivalent to an

extra 1.8 million tons, or approximately 10

per cent of Canada’s current annual pro-

duction—through elimination of tariffs.

“Our tariffs are higher than our compet-

itors’, bringing us a disadvantage,” he said.

“If this agreement can eliminate these

tariffs, that would have a huge impact on

value in what we sell into their country.”

White added that there is a need for

more predictable access, with exports

fluctuating from year to year. “As a suppli-

er, it’s very challenging,” he said. “We’re

looking for stabilization and elimination

of non-tariff issues in this agreement.”

Cam Dahl, president of Cereals Canada,

said the wheat sector has experienced sig-

nificant fluctuations in exports to China

over the past few years, which presents a

significant challenge to Canadian farmers.

“China is the world’s largest producer of

wheat,” he said. “Their government has

indicated repeatedly that it intends to be

self-sufficient in its wheat production.”

However, he added that Canada

supplies a different quality than China’s

largely medium-protein and medium-qual-

ity wheat. “Because of this, I believe there

will always be a reasonably strong market

for our wheat going into China.”

Canada currently has a tariff-rate quota

(TRQ) on the significant amount of grain

it exports to China. However, it is only be-

ing filled at nine per cent and is controlled

by China’s National Cereals, Oils and

Foodstuffs Import and Export Corpora-

tion, the state trading enterprise. Dahl

said that any steps to encourage China to

increase its TRQ fill rate could increase

Canada’s exports of that product.

“If TRQs could be allocated to more

companies looking to buy Canadian grain,

the demand would significantly increase,”

he said. “There are some adjustments to

an agreement that could go a long way for

all cereal grains.”

China applies a 10 per cent tariff on

imported Canadian malt. Because China

prefers to complete the malting process

at its own state-of-the-art facilities, it

imports a relatively small amount of

Canadian malt—approximately 10,000 to

15,000 tons per year. However, China is a

large consumer of malting and feed barley,

with tariffs currently set at three per cent

for seed.

“The Chinese are taking an awful

lot of malting barley from Canada,” de

Kemp said. “They’ve gone from import-

ing between 300,000 to 350,000 tons

three years ago, to between 700,000 to

900,000 tons this past year.”

The current tariff on Canadian feed

barley averages approximately $7 per ton.

As a top barley competitor in the world

market, Australia has secured an FTA

with China and therefore incurs no barley

tariff. This puts Canadian barley farmers

at a disadvantage.

“Eliminating that tariff will make us

more competitive,” de Kemp said.

An FTA with China is expected to open

up big opportunities for Canadian feed

barley, especially considering its protein

levels are three per cent higher than Aus-

tralian barley. The BCC is working with

select Chinese clients to introduce them

to Canadian feed barley and its benefits.

“Even though our price may be higher,

there’s an advantage and a savings for

them in reducing some of their pro-

tein-percentage requirements through

something like soybean meal in a poultry

or a hog ration,” de Kemp said.

In late July, a team of Chinese delegates

visited Western Canada to tour numerous

poultry, hog and feed mill operations as

well as a couple of barley-producing farms

in Alberta, and viewed barley research

projects being conducted at the University

of Saskatchewan.

In addition to the tariff issues, Canadi-

an exporters are experiencing non-tariff

barriers with the Chinese, such as incon-

sistencies in regulations, standards and

testing. Addressing non-tariff barriers will

require thorough and focused work on the

part of Canadian negotiators.

“We need scientifically based rules and

systems in place and a robust process for

dispute resolution,” Dahl said. “We do

not want to blur any of the lines between

Photo:CanadianPorkCouncil

Martin Rice, acting executive director of the Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance,

suggests Canada mustn’t lag behind on trade talks with China as it did with Korea.