Previous Page  35 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

Winter

2017

grainswest.com

35

Fighting Fusarium

The Alberta

Fusarium graminearum

Management Plan offers

several recommendations for combating

F. graminearum

:

• Always use healthy seed with no detectable levels of

F. graminearum

to avoid introducing the pathogen into

your production area.

• Prior to planting, treat all cereal and corn intended for

use as seed in Alberta with a registered fungicide that

includes the genus Fusarium on the label list of fungi that

are controlled.

• Leave at least two years between host crops (e.g., all small

grain cereals, corn). Continuous or short-rotation cereals

or corn allow for a buildup of

F. graminearum

on infested

residues.

• Avoid corn in rotation with small grain cereals. Corn is

also a host of

F. graminearum

, where it causes seed rot,

seedling blight, root rot, stalk rot and ear rot. However,

ultra-susceptible classes of wheat like durum or individual

varieties can also greatly increase the risk of infested

residues.

• If practical, avoid planting small grain cereals immediately

adjacent to cereal or corn fields where elevated levels of

F. graminearum

are known or suspected to occur.

• Increase seeding rates to promote a more uniform stand,

reduced tillering and a shorter flowering period for the

crop. This approach helps reduce the period the crop

is flowering, which is the growth stage most at risk for

infection.

• Stagger planting dates to avoid having all cereals on

the farm flowering synchronously and potentially being

exposed to weather conducive to disease development at

the same time. Humid weather during flowering (anthesis)

in wheat or heading in barley favours infection.

• Grow varieties with the best available levels of resistance.

• Producers growing small grain cereals under irrigation

may reduce the risk of head and seed infection through

careful water management.

• When an elevated risk of FHB is suspected, consider using

a well-timed fungicide application for FHB management.

• In mature crops where FHB has occurred, adjust combines

to blow out Fusarium-damaged wheat kernels (which are

lighter than other seeds) and infected chaff to improve

the grade and reduce toxin levels in harvested grain,

especially for wheat.

• Thorough chopping and uniform spread and distribution

of straw may encourage more rapid decomposition of

infested crop residue.

• Remove loose crop residue from all equipment before

leaving an infested field.

• Control volunteer cereals and grassy weeds on infested

land, including headlands.

from harvested grain. Nearly all management tools must be

implemented prior to seeing symptoms.”

Ultimately, producers must take an integrated approach that

employs as many tools as possible. “For diseases like blackleg

or scald, there are highly effective management techniques to

mitigate the risk,” said Turkington. “With

F. graminearum

, you

can use all the tools and still have significant yield loss, grade

reduction and mycotoxins.”

Durumdilemma

As if the basic challenges presented by

F. graminearum

weren’t

enough, the obstacles to effective management are even

greater when it comes to durum.

“Durum has historically been very susceptible,” said

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) research scientist

Ruan Yuefeng.

F. graminearum

is generally assessed in terms of incidence

(number of spikes affected), severity (amount of spike tissue

involved with the disease) and the effects on the grain, which

we measure as a proportion of Fusarium-damaged kernels,”

added Yuefeng’s colleague, AAFC biotechnologist Ron Knox.

“Durum tends to be higher in all three aspects.”

Both men stressed the importance of selecting the most

resistant varieties of durum. “Even though they can get infected

as well, you want to reduce the favourability of conditions for

the disease,” Knox said.

Seeds of discontent

One sector being hit hard by

F. graminearum

is the seed

industry, which is being hurt by the disease itself as well as the

provincial regulations designed to control its spread.

“With current regulations having zero tolerance for

F. graminearum

, samples must be treated and cleaned for the

disease, leaving less genetic material to go around,” said Kelly

Chambers, executive director of the Alberta Seed Growers.

“Even if the seed goes in clean, unless it’s a resistant variety

you likely have inoculants sitting in the soil,” she added.

“Under the right conditions, you will have

F. graminearum

develop, and without the province recognizing that, it

impedes the education process.”

Consequently, Chambers said producers feel they don’t

have to worry about the disease and may manage accordingly,

causing it to spread more rapidly.

One of the best tools for controlling the disease’s spread is

the use of Fusarium-resistant varieties, but that is easier said than

done in Alberta’s regulatory environment.

“Unfortunately, it’s that chicken-and-egg dilemma. If we

stick our heads in the sand and say ‘zero tolerance,’ we won’t

open doors for genetics coming to Alberta that could offer

resistance,” she said. “It’s perceived that we don’t need

those genetics because we don’t have Fusarium here, so the

provincial stance is a big obstacle to combating this disease.”